P. v. Rangel
Appellant was sentenced to 280 years to life in prison for committing numerous sex crimes against three young girls. He does not challenge the underlying validity of his convictions but rather claims that, as to one of the victims, there is insufficient evidence to support the jury's finding he personally used a dangerous or deadly weapon during some of the crimes he committed against her. Finding this claim meritorious, we will reverse the jury's weapon-use finding on four of the counts of which appellant was convicted. Due to an undisputed sentencing error, we will also remand the matter for resentencing. In all other respects, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Rangel