Spielberg v. Carlsen
James R. Baxter for Plaintiffs, Respondents and Cross-defendants.
In this appeal, defendant, appellant and cross-complainant Rainier Carlsen (defendant), appeals from the default judgment entered against him and in favor of plaintiffs, respondents and cross-defendants Frank and Gilda Spielberg (plaintiffs), on their complaint to quiet title to a piece of real property located near Apple Valley.[1] After the trial court struck defendant's cross-complaint, which defendant filed after plaintiffs' had submitted their documents to obtain defendant's default, defendant also purported to appeal that order. We consolidated the appeals for resolution in a single opinion. We conclude defendant's claims are meritless and therefore we will affirm.
Comments on Spielberg v. Carlsen