Forbes v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP
This case relates to a foreclosure on the home of plaintiff and appellant, Thomas Forbes. Forbes sued defendant and respondent Litton Loan Servicing, LP (Litton), for (1) violating Civil Code section 2923.5, which concerns notices of default; (2) violating Civil Code section 2923.6, which relates to loan modifications; (3) fraud; (4) actual fraud (Civ. Code, § 1572); (5) intentional misrepresentation; and (6) unfair competition (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200). The trial court sustained Litton's demurrer without leave to amend.
Forbes raises four issues on appeal. First, Forbes asserts the trial court denied him due process by not granting him leave to amend his first amended complaint. Second, Forbes contends the trial court showed that it was biased in favor of Litton. Third, Forbes contends the trial court erred by not considering his evidence. Fourth, Forbes asserts that the trial court erred by disregarding Forbes's motion to file an amended complaint. We affirm the judgment.
Comments on Forbes v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP