legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Victor B. v. Superior Court
Victor B. (Father) appeals from the juvenile court's ruling, following a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.21, subdivision (f),[1] hearing, that Father was provided reasonable services to reunify with his 14-year-old daughter, Z.G. Specifically, Father asserts Z.G.'s therapy failed to address reunification, Orange County Social Services Agency (SSA) refused to help pay for his telephone calls and postage from Mexico to the United States, and the social worker should have ensured Z.G. communicated with Father and could have better facilitated computer chats between them. The trial court concluded the services provided were reasonable before it terminated those services and scheduled a permanency hearing (§ 366.26).

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale