In re D.M.
Z.M. (Father) appeals from the order made at the dispositional hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 361)[1] removing his daughter D.M. from his custody and placing her with her mother (Mother) under a plan of family maintenance supervision. Father contends: (1) the juvenile court mistakenly believed a removal finding was necessary to place the child with Mother; and (2) there is insufficient evidence to support removal. We find no merit to his contentions and affirm the order.
Comments on In re D.M.