In re K.C.
J.G. (mother) appeals from orders of the juvenile court placing her child, K.C., in the custody of A.C. (father), and requiring that mother's visits with K.C. be monitored. Mother contends the juvenile court abused its discretion by failing to specify the frequency and duration of her visits with K.C., and ordering that mother's visits with K.C. be monitored. Father and K.C. disagree.[1] We affirm.
Comments on In re K.C.