P. v. Ramirez
Appellant Javier Estrada Ramirez appeals from the judgment entered following his conviction by jury on four counts related to a carjacking incident. Appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a robbery count because he did not use force or fear to take personal property from the person named in the information. Appellant's second contention is that the trial court erred in refusing to stay the sentence on the robbery count pursuant to Penal Code section 654.[1] We conclude that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the robbery conviction, and so reverse the conviction on that count. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Ramirez