P. v. Plancarte
Following the denial of motions to discover information relating to a confidential informant, to quash a search warrant, and to suppress evidence pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5,[1] defendant Daniel Plancarte pleaded no contest to manufacturing methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379.6, subd. (a)), possessing methamphetamine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378), possessing cocaine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351), and endangering the health of a child (§ 273a, subd. (a)); defendant Daniel Charles Martinez pleaded no contest to conspiracy (§ 182, subd. (a)(1)) and possessing methamphetamine for sale; and defendant Gabriela Toscano pleaded no contest to endangering the health of a child and making space available for manufacturing controlled substances (Health & Saf. Code, § 11366.5). The trial court sentenced Plancarte to prison for five years and Martinez to prison for three years eight months. As to Toscano, the court suspended imposition of sentence and placed her on probation for four years.
On appeal, defendants contend that the trial court erred in denying their motions. For the reasons we state below, we will affirm all three judgments.
Comments on P. v. Plancarte