Stull v. Noble Logistics Services
For a little more than a year, appellant Bryan Stull delivered pharmaceuticals and medical supplies for respondent PharMerica Corporation (PharMerica). For the deliveries, PharMerica required Stull to wear a blue polo shirt and khaki pants or shorts, begin his routes at a specific time and location, complete deliveries without detours or breaks, and promptly return invoices and undelivered pharmaceuticals to PharMerica's pharmacy. Asserting that PharMerica exercised complete control over his deliveries, Stull filed suit claiming
that he was PharMerica's employee and had been denied the benefits and protections for employees provided by the Labor Code. The trial court entered judgment for defendants based on its conclusion that Stull was an independent contractor.
On appeal, Stull argues that the trial court erred in finding him to have been an independent contractor to PharMerica. (ARB 2) We shall reject his contention that the â€
Comments on Stull v. Noble Logistics Services