Crimson California Pipeline v. Segundo Prop,
After a dispute arose under their license agreement, the parties filed cross-actions for declaratory and other relief. When the trial court denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, it construed the license agreement in favor of defendant and invited a motion for judgment on the pleadings. Defendant moved for judgment on the pleadings, which was granted. In this appeal from the judgment and attorney fee order, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in granting the motion for judgment on the pleadings. In light of our determination that plaintiff should have been allowed to amend the complaint to allege a different interpretation of the agreement, Court reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Comments on Crimson California Pipeline v. Segundo Prop,