In re A.M.
D.B. (mother) appeals from an order terminating parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code § 366.26) to her son, five-year-old A.M. Mother contends the Kern County Superior Court (court) erred by rejecting her argument that termination would be detrimental to A.M. based on their parent/child relationship (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)). On review, Court disagree and affirm.

Comments on In re A.M.

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced