legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Hill
Ivan Hill was convicted of six murders committed in 1993 and 1994. Evidence that he committed two other murders was presented during the penalty phase of that case and he was sentenced to death. He was then charged in this case with those two murders. He moved to dismiss, claiming that under Penal Code sections 654 and 954, the two murders should have been joined with the six murders charged in the capital case. He also claimed prosecution for these murders placed him twice in jeopardy because these same murders had been found true beyond a reasonable doubt in the capital case. He raises these same issues on appeal. Court find neither constitutional nor statutory prohibition against this prosecution and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale