In re A.D.
C.V. (mother) appealed from a March 2010 order terminating her parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26) to her son A.D. (child).[1] After reviewing the entire record, mothers court-appointed appellate counsel informed this court she could find no arguable issues to raise on mothers behalf. Counsel requested and this court granted leave for mother to personally file a letter setting forth a good cause showing that an arguable issue of reversible error did exist. (In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835, 844.) Mother has since submitted a letter in which she describes her current efforts to improve herself. She also asks for a chance to bond with her child. She protests that she never had the opportunity to do so. Having reviewed the matter, we conclude mothers letter does not set forth a good cause showing of any arguable issue of reversible error at the termination hearing. (In re Phoenix H., supra, 47 Cal.4th at p. 844.) Rather, she appears to complain about her childs detention upon his birth in August 2009.
Comments on In re A.D.