In re Aiden O.
In these consolidated proceedings, Jorge O. appeals jurisdictional and dispositional orders declaring his child, Aiden O., a dependent child of the juvenile court, denying his request for discovery and denying him reunification services. He contends the evidence was insufficient to support the jurisdictional finding under Welfare and Institutions Code[1] section 300, subdivision (e); the court erred by denying his request for discovery; the evidence was insufficient to support removal from his custody; and the court erred by denying him reunification services and abused its discretion by granting the district attorney (DA) access to records of the juvenile dependency proceedings. Court affirm the orders.
Comments on In re Aiden O.