Atashi v. Foothill Nissan
Mehrdad Taheripour and Mehran Farhadi appeal from the order granting a new trial to plaintiff and cross-defendant Jobe Atashi after the jury reached what the trial court believed were inconsistent verdicts in this action arising from Atashis agreement to buy a share in Taheripour and Farhadis auto dealership. Because appellants did not provide an adequate appellate record and otherwise failed to show the trial court erred, we affirm and remand for new trial.
Comments on Atashi v. Foothill Nissan