P. v. Arguelles
Robert Arguelles appeals from the judgment entered following a court trial at which he was determined to be a mentally disordered offender (MDO). (Pen. Code, 2960 et seq.) Appellant asserts that the evidence does not support the finding that the commitment offenses, vandalism and carrying a concealed weapon, involved the use of force or violence or an express or implied threat thereof within the meaning of section 2962, subdivision (e)(2)(P) or (e)(2)(Q). Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Arguelles