In re D.E.
D.E. (father) appeals from a 2009 order terminating parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26) to his daughter, D. D. has been a dependent child of the Fresno County Superior Court since 2001. Father contends the court erred, dating back to 2001, because there was no on the record inquiry of either parent regarding Native American heritage for the purposes of the Indian Child Welfare Act (IWCA; 25 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.). He also challenges the courts finding at the section 366.26 hearing that it was likely D. would be adopted. On review, Court affirm.
Comments on In re D.E.