In re E.G.
H.G. (mother) appealed from an order terminating her parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26) to her two year old daughter, E.G.[1] After reviewing the entire record, mothers court-appointed appellate counsel informed this court he found no arguable issues to raise in this appeal. Counsel requested, and this court granted, leave for mother to personally file a letter setting forth a good cause showing that an arguable issue of reversible error does exist. (In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835.) Mother has since faxed to this court a letter in which she claims she was not properly represented by her court-appointed trial attorney at the jurisdictional phase of her daughters dependency proceedings. Mother accuses him of withholding evidence and tricking her into submitting to the allegations but provides no details. She contends she would have never submitted to these allegations had she known the circumstances or the consequences. She also accuses a social worker assigned to the case during the reunification period of lying but again provides no details.
Comments on In re E.G.