P. v. Perodin
Chanel M. Perodin appeals a judgment after her conviction of voluntary manslaughter (Pen. Code, 192, subd. (a)), assault on a child causing death ( 273ab), and child abuse ( 273a, subd. (a)). Court conclude, among other things, that 1) statements Perodin made to police without being advised of her Miranda rights (Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436) were admissible because she was not under arrest or in custody when she made her statements, and 2) substantial evidence supports the judgment. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Perodin