legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Perodin
Chanel M. Perodin appeals a judgment after her conviction of voluntary manslaughter (Pen. Code, 192, subd. (a)), assault on a child causing death ( 273ab), and child abuse ( 273a, subd. (a)). Court conclude, among other things, that 1) statements Perodin made to police without being advised of her Miranda rights (Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436) were admissible because she was not under arrest or in custody when she made her statements, and 2) substantial evidence supports the judgment. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale