P. v. Craig
On appeal, Craig asserts the evidence was insufficient to support the first degree murder conviction under a natural and probable consequences theory or under a felony-murder theory. Specifically, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence corroborating the accomplices (Guzmans) testimony. He asserts the evidence was also insufficient to support the conspiracy to commit felony assault conviction. In addition, Craig argues it was reversible error for the trial court to prevent a witness from being recalled by the defense and also by excluding a note written by the murder victim. Court conclude none of his contentions have merit, and Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Craig