P. v. Legaspi
Defendant Diego Legaspi appeals from a judgment of conviction after a jury convicted him of one count of transportation of cocaine base (Health & Saf. Code, 11352, subd. (a), a felony), one count of possession of cocaine base (id., 11350, subd. (a), a felony), and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia (id., 11364, a misd.). During trial, defendant pleaded no contest to one count of driving on a suspended license (Veh. Code, 14601.2, subd. (a), a misd.).
In a bifurcated proceeding, the trial court found true enhancement allegations that defendant had one prior conviction for transportation of cocaine base (Health & Saf. Code, 11352, subd (a)), that defendant had one prior conviction that qualified as a strike under the Three Strikes Law (Pen. Code, 667, subds. (b)-(i); 1170.12); and that defendant had served a prior prison term ( 667.5, subd. (b)). On the prosecutions motion, the court dismissed allegations that defendant had suffered two other prior prison terms.
Comments on P. v. Legaspi