legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Ortiz
Defendant Louis Fernando Ortiz was charged by felony complaint with second degree robbery (Pen. Code, 211-212.5, subd. (c)). Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, defendant pleaded no contest to the robbery charge and admitted that he committed the offense for the benefit of a criminal street gang ( 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(C)). The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed defendant on probation for three years with various terms and conditions. Among other things, the trial court ordered defendant (1) to submit to chemical testing as directed by the probation officer, (2) to abstain from the use of drugs and alcohol and to stay away from places where alcohol is the chief item of sale, (3) to submit to an official search of his personal property at any time, and (4) to refrain from appearing at court proceedings except in limited circumstances. On appeal, defendant contends that these conditions are invalid and must be stricken from the probation order. Court agree that the chemical testing and alcohol conditions must be stricken. Additionally, Court modify the court appearance condition to comply with constitutional standards. Court will affirm the judgment as so modified.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale