P. v. Gomez
Court agree with appellant that the court violated its sua sponte duty to instruct the jury on accomplice testimony principles as to prosecution witness Andrew Ayungua. Court conclude, however, that the error was harmless. Court also agree that the record affirmatively reflects the court's misunderstanding regarding its discretion to impose a concurrent indeterminate sentence on count 5. Court shall therefore order the matter remanded for resentencing on that count. In all other respects,Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Gomez