P. v. Elournoy
Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and proceedings below. Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel refers to as possible, but not arguable, issues: (1) whether Elournoy was properly advised of his constitutional rights and the consequences of pleading guilty and did he voluntarily waive his rights; and (2) whether Elournoy received the stipulated sentence to which he agreed.
Comments on P. v. Elournoy