Roeder v. Gardner
Plaintiff John Roeder appeals from the order granting in part defendant Alan Gardners motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statute (Code Civ. Proc., 425.16),[1] and awarding defendant attorney fees on the motion. Plaintiff challenges the granting of the motion as to the four causes of action stricken by the court, and the attorney fee award. We conclude that the motion was incorrectly granted as to the causes of action for extortion and defamation, and that the attorney fee award needs to be reexamined in light of that result. Court thus affirm the order in part and reverse it in part.
Comments on Roeder v. Gardner