legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Gardner v. Schwarzenegger
Defendants Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr., and Secretary of State Debra Bowen (collectively defendants) appeal from an order awarding plaintiffs Cliff Gardner, Drug Policy Alliance, and California Society of Addiction Medicine (collectively plaintiffs) $423,975 in attorney fees. We recently affirmed the judgment for plaintiffs in this action, which enjoined enforcement of legislationSenate Bill No. 1137 (2005-2006 Reg. Sess.) sections 1 through 12 (Stats. 2006, ch. 63, 1−12; hereafter Senate Bill 1137)that had sought to amend the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000 (hereafter Proposition 36). (Gardner v. Schwarzenegger (2009) 178 Cal.App.4th 1366, 1369 (Gardner I).) Defendants do not dispute plaintiffs entitlement to attorney fees under the private attorney general statute (Code Civ. Proc., 1021.5),[1] but contest the amount of the award against them. Defendants argue that the court erred in: accepting the hourly rates claimed by plaintiffs attorneys, awarding a multiplier, and failing to apportion some responsibility for the award to other defendants in the case. court find no abuse of discretion as to any of these determinations, and affirm the order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale