P. v. Duran
Appellant Quinton Duran (Duran) appeals his convictions for possession, possession for sale, and transportation of a controlled substance (Health and Saf. Code, 11350, subd. (a), 11351, 11352, subd. (a),) and giving false information to a police officer (Pen. Code, 148.9, subd. (a)). Durans sole contention on appeal is that the trial court violated his constitutional right to counsel by denying his motion to substitute a privately retained attorney for his appointed counsel. court conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as untimely, and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Duran