Conservatorship of D.N.
. H., the conservator and mother of conservatee D. N., appeals from an order suspend[ing] her as conservator and appointing the Sacramento County Public Guardians Office (public guardian) successor conservator.
On appeal, L. H. and D. N. (who is a respondent) contend the court erred in suspending L. H. as conservator, trial counsel for D. N. did not have standing to bring the motion to suspend her, and in any event, he was ineffective for doing so against D. N.s wishes.
The public guardian responds the suspension order is not appealable and the appeal is moot. She further responds the court did not abuse its discretion by suspending L. H. as conservator.
As to the mootness issue, Court rejected an identical argument in an order filed September 17, 2009, which Court issued in response to the public guardians motion to dismiss filed approximately two months before she filed her respondents brief. Court need not address the issue again.
Comments on Conservatorship of D.N.