Harpel v. Spina
In this appeal, plaintiffs and appellants Gina and Mitchell Harpel (appellants) challenge: (1) the order of the trial court sustaining without leave to amend defendant and respondent R&S Homes, Inc.s (R&S) demurrer to their first amended complaint (FAC) against R&S for breach of contract and fraud; (2) the trial courts grant of respondent Robert Waals (Waal) motion for judgment on the pleadings (MJOP) without leave to amend on the same FAC; (3) the trial courts order granting R&S and Waals (collectively, respondents) motions for sanctions against appellants and appellants counsel in connection with the demurrer and MJOP; (4) the trial courts denial of appellants request to reconsider the aforementioned orders; and (5) the trial courts imposition of further sanctions against appellants and appellants counsel in response to appellants request for reconsideration. court affirm in part and reverse in part.
Comments on Harpel v. Spina