P. v. Lusk
Defendant and appellant Sean Deandre Lusk pleaded nolo contendere pursuant to a plea bargain; he appeals contending that his sentence violated the plea agreement. The People raise an additional issue that defendants sentence was unauthorized. Because the unauthorized sentence fundamentally altered the nature of the plea bargain, Court reverse the judgment and remand with directions to the trial court to permit defendant to withdraw his plea.
Comments on P. v. Lusk