P. v. Roberson
Maurice Van Roberson appeals from a judgment recommitting him to the Department of Mental Health (department) as a sexually violent predator (SVP) within the meaning of California's Sexually Violent Predators Act (SVPA). (Welf. & Inst. Code, 6600 et seq.)[1] He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding that he met the criteria as an SVP, and contends that the SVPA, as amended, (revised SVPA) is unconstitutional. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Roberson