Humble v. Veterinary Medical Board of California
Following an accusation issued by the Veterinary Medical Board of California (Board), an administrative law judge (ALJ) issued a proposed decision that sustained a single count of negligence against Joseph A. Humble, stayed revocation of his veterinary license, and placed him on probation for two years. The Board adopted the proposed decision, but reduced Humbles probation period to one year.
Humble appeals following the denial by the trial court of his petition for writ of administrative mandate, in which he sought to vacate the Boards decision. Humble contends the trial courts ruling is not supported by substantial evidence, the court erred in relying on the testimony of the Boards expert witness, and the case should be remanded for reconsideration of the penalty. Finding no merit in any of these contentions, Court shall affirm the judgment.
Comments on Humble v. Veterinary Medical Board of California