legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Jee-MacDougall v. County of Los Angeles

When claims were asserted against respondents as former employees of appellant County of Los Angeles (the County), they asked the County to provide a defense pursuant to Government Code section 995, a provision of the California Tort Claims Act (Gov. Code, 810 et seq.). After the County denied the request, respondents sought relief by petition for writ of mandate. The trial court directed the County to offer to provide a defense through counsel that it had engaged to defend another employee. Concluding that a conflict would result from any attempt by the County to provide joint representation to respondents and the other employee, Court reverse.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale