In re S.T.
Y.T. (Father) appeals from an order of the juvenile court regarding his son, S.T., by which the court terminated its jurisdiction over the child, and granted joint legal and physical custody to Father and S.W. (Mother). Father argues on appeal that the juvenile court failed to consider the childs best interests, and did not have evidence before it to support its order that Father have visits with S.T. on alternate weekends. He further argues that the courts order regarding extended summer visits for each parent was impermissibly vague. Court conclude that Father has not demonstrated any error on appeal. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re S.T.