In re R.A.
Welfare and Institutions Code section 300. Father contends substantial evidence does not support the jurisdictional findings under section 300, subdivision (b), relating to his marijuana use, the order removing son from his custody, or the dispositional orders restricting his marijuana use. Courttt hold substantial evidence supports the jurisdictional findings and removal order. Court further hold that fathers contention regarding the orders restricting his marijuana use was forfeited by his failure to object below and, in any event, such orders were not an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re R.A.