legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Stanley
In this appeal, defendant Andrew Daniel Stanley contends the trial court erred in refusing to allow him Penal Code section 2900.5, subdivision (a) credits for the time he spent in residential drug and alcohol treatment facilities, on the ground defendant failed to complete any treatment program.
The People concede, and we agree, that the trial court erred in concluding defendant is categorically ineligible for custody credit. We remand to the trial court for a determination consistent with this opinion of the time credits, if any, to which defendant may be entitled for days spent in residential drug treatment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale