Marriage of Carrino
Vincent Carrino (Vincent)[1] appeals from a Judgment Reforming and Enforcing Judicially Supervised November 2, 2006 Settlement Agreement in which the trial court reformed a portion of a settlement agreement after finding Vincent failed to provide his former wife Ann Camino (Ann)[2] with information regarding the value of one of their assets. He contends: (1) he had no duty to inform Ann of his opinion regarding the value of the asset; (2) Ann had a duty to determine the value of the asset on her own; (3) Ann knowingly and intelligently waived obtaining [the] information; (4) the language of the [settlement] agreement is clear and not reasonably susceptible to Anns [and the trial courts] interpretation; and (5) the trial court should have set aside the entire settlement agreement instead of reforming only one portion of it. Court reject the contentions and affirm the judgment.
Comments on Marriage of Carrino