P. v. Ahmadpour
Abulghasen Ahmadpour appeals from the judgment entered after his conviction by a jury of five counts of filing or recording a forged instrument (counts 1, 3, 4, 6, and 7 - Pen. Code, 115, subd. (a))[1] and two counts of forgery (counts 2 and 5 - 470, subd. (d)). He was sentenced to prison for seven years. Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support his convictions and that the trial court erroneously (1) failed to discharge a juror, (2) failed to inquire into the travel plans of two jurors, (3) limited his cross-examination and impeachment of prosecution witnesses, (4) admitted the expert opinion of a prosecution witness and excluded the expert opinion of a defense witness, and (5) excluded a title insurance policy. Appellant's final contention is that the prosecutor committed misconduct during closing argument. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Ahmadpour