P. v. Coln
Appellant Jeremy Micah Coln appeals from his conviction of theft of access card account information (Pen. Code, 484e, subd. (d)).[1] He argues that the trial court committed reversible error by allowing the prosecutor to amend the information to add a charge not supported by evidence presented at the preliminary hearing, and by allowing the prosecutor to introduce irrelevant, unfairly prejudicial evidence at trial. He also contends the evidence is legally insufficient to support his conviction.
Court find no prejudicial error, and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Coln