legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Adams
On August 6, 2007, the San Bernardino County District Attorneys Office filed a felony complaint against defendant and appellant Nichole Marie Adams (defendant); it charged defendant with one count of forgery under Penal Code section 470, subdivision (d). On November 8, 2007, defendant pled no contest to the forgery count, with the understanding that she would receive 120 days in county jail, with eligibility for the weekender work-release program. On December 13, 2007, defendant was sentenced to supervised probation for three years and 60 days in county jail as a term of probation, with eligibility for the weekender work-release program (probation term No. 1).
On April 17, 2008, defendants motion to reinstate the weekender work-release program was denied, and a probation revocation hearing was set. On May 29, 2008, an evidentiary hearing was held regarding defendants failure to report to a scheduled work-release program. The trial court found defendant to be in violation of probation term No. 1. The court revoked defendants probation, and reinstated it, with modifications. Under probation term No. 1, as modified, the court ordered defendant to spend 180 days in jail, straight time. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in revoking her probation. For the reasons set forth below, Court shall affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale