In re M.D.
J.D. (father) appeals the juvenile courts Welfare and Institutions Code[1] section 366.26 orders in the consolidated dependency cases of his six children. The court found by clear and convincing evidence that the children were likely to be adopted and that none of the statutory exceptions to a termination of parental rights applied. ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1).) The court then terminated fathers parental rights and approved a permanent plan of adoption for the six children. ( 366.26, subd. (b)(1).) Father claims the court committed two errors: (1) finding the children were likely to be adopted ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)); and (2) not finding father maintained regular visitation and contact with the child and the child would benefit from continuing the relationship ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)). Court affirm, as there is substantial evidence in the reports submitted by the Orange County Social Services Agency (SSA) supporting the courts findings and orders.
Comments on In re M.D.