Azarkman v. Mitchell
Ron Azarkman appeals from a judgment rejecting his claim for damages stemming from Shannon Mitchells alleged anticipatory repudiation of a construction contract entered into between the parties. The case was tried without a jury, and Azarkman argues the court erred by completely ignor[ing] the case [he] pleaded and proved a claim Azarkman supports by pointing out the court made no specific findings against him with respect to the statutory theory he relied upon.
Comments on Azarkman v. Mitchell