Stenfors v. Banning
Christopher S. Banning appeals from a judgment quieting title to real property in favor of respondents Jeffrey Stenfors and Marimi Ichikawa, trustees of the Stenfors family trust, and an order denying his motion to vacate the judgment. Appellant contends the judgment must be reversed and remanded with directions to enter a new judgment quieting title in his favor or, alternatively, declaring he has an easement or license to continue to use the property in dispute. Respondents provided undisputed evidence they are the legal owners of the property, for which they hold a recorded grant deed, and they paid all the property taxes on the property, while appellant concededly had no recorded grant deed and provided no corroborative evidence of payment of consideration for the disputed property. Court therefore affirm the judgment.
Comments on Stenfors v. Banning