In re M.H.
Defendant M.H. appeals from a dispositional order continuing him as a ward of the court and committing him to a county rehabilitation facility for 270 days after he was found to have committed first degree residential burglary (Pen. Code, 459, 460, subd. (a)).[1] Defendants counsel has filed an opening brief that raises no issues and asks this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was notified of his right to file a supplemental brief, but has not done so. Court find no arguable issues and affirm.
Comments on In re M.H.