Chaidez v. City of La Mesa
Roberto Chaidez appeals a judgment of dismissal after the trial court sustained without leave to amend the demurrer of the City of La Mesa (the City) and certain officers of the La Mesa Police Department (LMPD)[1] on his complaint alleging that when he was arrested in 2004, cash was taken from him and not reported on a property inventory form. The court determined the complaint does not state a cause of action because Chaidez failed to comply with the claim presentation requirement of the Government Claims Act (Gov. Code, 810 et seq.) and LMPD employees are statutorily immune from liability. Court affirm the judgment on the first issue, which renders the second issue moot.
Comments on Chaidez v. City of La Mesa