In re J.Z.
The minor, J.Z., challenges the juvenile court order selecting guardianship as the permanent plan. He argues that respondents C.W. (mother) and Frederick Z. (father) failed to meet their burden to show that the exception to termination of parental rights for parents who have continuing beneficial relationships with their dependent children applied here. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).)[1] We conclude that substantial evidence supports the juvenile courts order.
Comments on In re J.Z.