legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Marriage of Leuzinger
Respondent and appellant Mark A. Leuzinger (Mark)[1]appeals a judgment on reserved issues entered by the trial court in marital dissolution proceedings between Mark and his former wife, Gail Stark-Leuzinger (Gail). On appeal, Mark argues that the trial court failed to divide the parties community property furnishings and appliances, mischaracterized certain other assets and liabilities, and failed to divide the parties community property estate equally, as required by Family Code section 2550.[2] We conclude that Marks contention that the trial court failed to divide the furnishings and appliances has merit, but that Marks remedy is a motion or order to show cause in the trial court pursuant to section 2556. Mark forfeited his other contentions by failing to follow the applicable rules of appellate procedure. Furthermore, even if we were to address those contentions, Mark has failed to demonstrate reversible error. Court deny Gails motion for sanctions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale