Critzer v. City of Cupertino
The underlying facts of this case involve a dispute between neighbors over a newly installed and allegedly intrusive bathroom window. The legal questions before us involve issues of municipal administrative procedure and constitutional due process requirements. Appellants present the following claims: the trial court wrongly denied them the remedy of administrative mandamus relief, erred by failing to rule that exhaustion of administrative remedies would be futile, and erred by striking and dismissing the Critzers request for so-called traditional mandamus relief. They also present constitutional due process claims. Court disagree in each case and will affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Comments on Critzer v. City of Cupertino