P. v. Harper
This case comes to us on retrial after we reversed defendant Daniel James Harpers convictions because the trial court repeatedly and erroneously told defendant that he had the right to have an attorney reappointed, leading him to enter a waiver of counsel that was not knowing and intelligent. (People v. Harper (Jan. 24, 2008, C052464) [nonpub. opn.], pp. 1-2.)
In this appeal, defendant raises issues relating to sentencing enhancements and presentence credits. Finding merit only in his credits argument, we modify the judgment and affirm the judgment as modified.
Comments on P. v. Harper