P. v. Kramer
A jury convicted James Palmer Kramer of burglary (Pen. Code, 459)[1] and petty theft ( 484) of merchandise at a Home Depot store. The trial court sentenced Kramer to three years' formal probation with the condition, among others, that he serve 120 days in local custody.
Kramer contends that (1) the trial court erred in denying two of his motions in limine to exclude evidence; (2) the trial court improperly sustained certain hearsay objections; (3) the trial court improperly instructed the jury with CALJIC Nos. 361 and 362; (4) defense counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel; and (5) insufficient evidence supports the petty theft conviction. Court conclude that Kramer has not identified any prejudicial error, and accordingly Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Kramer